Marriage is an outdated institution essays

It's still regarded as important by some. Or is there something more in marriage? We read together , and you listened to those words , 'in sickness and in health'. It's a declaration of love on a formalised basis. It shows the world how the couple think about each other and, more importantly,they make a deeply personal commitment to each other. I don't feel it's something to be taken lightly or frivolously. I have a feeling that marriage will become less and less important and, who knows, completely outdated in years to come.

  • Marriage outdated essay.
  • joining words academic essay.
  • Are feminism and marriage mutually exclusive?.
  • Learn more.
  • qualitative thesis proposal outline.
  • The Future of Marriage | Cato Unbound.
  • JavaScript!

A lot of people say that it doesn't matter, as long as you're happy and secure together and that your kids have two loving parents it doesn't matter about the ring or the piece of paper. Education seems to have a big impact on marriage in present times more than it had in the past. Good Essays words 5.

Is marriage an outdated institution? |

Marriage rates have decreased over the years around the world due to these different factors. For many people education is highly valued and they have concerns that starting a family will get in the way of it. People also feel the need to be financially secure before started their own family. They want to be sure that they can support themselves before bringing someone else into their life to care for It is present in every known human society.

However, there is no single, universally accepted definition of what marriage is. It is a constantly evolving institution with many different facets.

Essay on marriage is an outdated institution

It varies with every group and culture. In almost all societies, marriage is a socially accepted union between a man and a woman. Yet, that definition is changing in modern times. Same-sex marriage—while still not universally socially accepted—is becoming more prevalent, not only in the United States, but also in other cultures around the world Good Essays words 6.

Cancel Marriage: Merav Michaeli at TEDxJaffa

For example, an article by Bahar Gholipour from Livescience website expounded on the Centers for Disease and Control CDC brought correlated concerns from the Pews Research Center about current fertility rate for women currently stands at 1. We look at those who have come before us, and try to make improvements to better fit our current lives.

  • What You Lose When You Gain a Spouse.
  • cover letter for national account manager!
  • thesis statement about christianity and islam;
  • Pick Your Own.
  • Breadcrumb.
  • Similar Topics.
  • can paper with writing on it be recycled?

Although arguments have been made which suggest that marriage is an option for cohabitating couples, it can be argued marriage could have been offered to same- sex couples therefore, no hesitation should be made in creating legislation which allows cohabitating couples to enter a partnership, moreover there are fewer justifications with regard to the reluctances. It must also be considered why cohabitants choose not to enter a marriage, some may argue that if they want access to laws that govern married couples they can get married however, there are various reasons that can be used to justify why certain people refrain.

Marriage Outdated Essay

The prohibitions of marriages are set put in the Marriage prohibited degree of relationship Act , relationships between blood relatives are void, however there are other relationships which have restrictions such as getting married to a former spouse of a son, the only means that the marriage can occur is if, the son dies, the mother of the son dies and providing that both parties are above This illustrates the difficulty that one may face therefore giving them no choice of marriage thus lack of protection and rights.

Cohabitants should have access to similar rights to married couples; there are various justifications that can be used to support this argument.

Firstly a relationship is fundamentally based on the same principles regardless of marriage, Barlow and James argue that the law treats cohabitants as married in certain situation, and not in others, they argue that the remedies are far more inferior and are inconsistent.. Scotland introduced new laws that do offer protection under the Family Law Scotland Act providing a skeleton of laws that allow cohabitants to pursue financial claim on the breakdown of a marriage, It must be noted that not all cohabitants would gain the benefits under Scottish law.

The eligibility requirements are met if there is a child, if there is no child then the duration of the relationship the subject that is considered. Currently in Scotland there is an opt out scheme; this is because some people make a conscious decision not to get married, so that they are not bound by the laws. With regard to Scottish law it can be argued that England and Wales should also follow in the same footsteps.

France, Belgium, Portugal and Spain have also embarked on new bills being passed. There is notably a public and private divide regarding marriage and cohabitation, the law is restricted to intervene in certain private aspects under Article 8 ECHR. The risks that are attached to cohabitating contracts are substantial as seen in Balfour v Balfour, thus making them less reliable and protective to marriage.


Marriages are an outdated institution.

The law commission has published a report which makes recommendations to parliament regarding laws that govern cohabitants. They argue that marriage is declining and cohabitation is increasing, therefore resulting in more families relying upon cohabitation laws, however they are not governed properly. Therefore it is essential to discuss the potential reform as it could change cohabitation law dramatically. The report accepts that cohabitating couples should not have access to the same rights as married couples, as they have not made a public commitment, the report states eligibility requirements which apply only, if the couple have a child together or if they have been together between 2- 5 years.

It can be argued that the report does not offer substantial relief; it can be argued that property law already governs this aspect of cohabitation with regard to the law of constructive trusts. A further criticism of the report is that it does not regard tax, social security and next of kin rights, therefore not broadening cohabitation laws more than they already are.

It is evident that the law does not place cohabitation on the same par as marriage and is seen as a second class institution, although there has been allot of discussion about the issue, the actuality is that no reform has occurred up to date, many academics also argue that no reform will occur as their are other means of protection, as discussed in this paper, these forms of protection are not reliable enough and arguably very specific therefore may only protect specific cohabitants that mirror marriage.